Harley Reid is being encouraged to retain his trademark physical presence once the young West Coast star comes back from his two-game suspension.
Adam Simpson, the coach of the WEST Coast team, encourages Harley Reid to uphold his characteristic physical play style. He believes that the top draft pick has gained valuable experience from his initial AFL suspension and managing intense opposition attention.
Reid received a two-week suspension for forcefully taking down St Kilda’s Darcy Wilson in a dangerous tackle during the clash last weekend.
During a challenging second half, Reid faced a tough time as he only managed three disposals in the final two quarters and gave away four free kicks due to being closely marked by Marcus Windhager.
As a result of the suspension, Reid won’t be available for the upcoming home game against North Melbourne at Optus Stadium and the away match against Essendon on June 23. With the bye week in between, Reid will be sidelined for 29 days.
Reid’s style of play, which includes powerful fend-offs and aggressive tackles, is a key aspect of his game. Simpson is keen on ensuring that the 19-year-old doesn’t retreat into a defensive shell following the suspension.
“The (tackling) action has set him back a few weeks,” remarked Simpson on Friday.
“We need to find a way to adapt without compromising his physicality and aggressive style of play.
“He gained valuable experience last week in handling increased scrutiny, which he coped with quite well.
“Dealing with opposition tags and run-with tactics, and finding ways to support him, is crucial as well.”
Reid’s suspension renders him ineligible for the Rising Star award. Several coaches have criticized the regulation, arguing that players shouldn’t be disqualified for an on-field act like a tackle.
“The regulation has existed for some time,” remarked Simpson.
“What has evolved are the types of incidents that are deemed reportable over the years.
“There are possibly more actions that can lead to penalties inadvertently now, whereas in the past, significant misconduct was required to warrant missing a match.”
